A curious and entirely practical Sabre with a raised false-edge and a coral hilt that belonged to Archduke Ferdinand II, Germany, ca. 1560, housed at the Kunsthistorisches Museum.

A good full sized Victorian suit of armour, well made with rolled and gadrooned edges, articulated arms, feet and gauntlets. Standing on its original frame and plinth.

Includes bibliographical references

Light field aermour with a close helmet. The right gauntlet is restored. The backplate is missing.

I think that armour is one of the hallmarks of civilisation. I speak here of civilisation in the classic sense: agrarian, stratified, complex societies in which a calorific surplus supports classes of specialists. Armour was an effective means of gaining military advantage for most of human history. Every tribe had access to weapons, every tribe had its fair share of violent men, but there are things about armour that require a level of organisation and wealth unavailable to nomadic peoples living in small kinship groups but that is available to settled people who live in towns and cities connected by trade. The fact of there being sufficient surplus to invest into military technology and the incentive to do so (to protect the surplus) means that military tech seems to emerge out of the situation spontaneously. Military technology is like a physical manifestation of the basic human desire to do violence with impunity, and the cultural environment provided by civilisation allows it to thrive. Historical armour worked, every single piece of armour I have included would have provided a degree of protection from injury from the kinds of weapons that the members of those cultures would have encountered. All other things being equal, the armoured individual wins the fight. In addition to this, armour also functions effectively as a sign of status. Its effectiveness as a sign and its effectiveness as a protective garment are inextricably linked: craftsmanship implies laborious attainment of skill, wealth, power. In order to produce effective armour there is a degree of organisation that needs to take place; organisation of labour, development of special skills, economic activity associated with the acquisition of materials, the production of surplus to support it all. The warrior wearing the armour carries around the evidence of this civilisation like a talisman. The more magnificent the armour the more cunning and splendid the civilisation behind it all must be. It could also be said that by implying the presence of sophisticated civilisation behind it all, the warriors are also advertising their own effectiveness as men of violence. With such sheep, what must the shepherds be like? ---------------------------------------- In terms of game mechanics I am conflicted. I simultaneously love the bewildering variety of armour and armour components available and dislike too much mechanical complexity. I am pretty happy with a system of light, medium and heavy armour, with helmets and shields providing extra bonuses, but would like to have a very crunchy system where lowly characters in jackboots and wooden helmets strip slain enemies of their rancid fish leather cuirasses to gain a small advantage. Ideally, everything in every game should be unique, it should be illustrated and it should be culturally and mechanically embedded in the game. So rather than wearing a wearing a mail shirt, a character should be wearing a rusty baidana with the names of the twenty-seven Thulean saints inscribed upon the rings. (+3 AC, +1 reaction among Praskoviyan Heretics, -4 reaction among Laighlander clergy). This is probably too ponderous. {The other option is to rule Fibre, Wood, Skin and Textile armor as Light (+1 AC), Scale, Lamellar, Brigandine,Coats-of-Plates and Mail as Medium (+3 AC) Plate as Heavy (+5 AC), Helmets and small shields offer +1 AC each and large shields offer +2 AC} _____________ What follows is a crude typology I established based on a few feckless days of perfunctory perusal and the raiding of Pinterest pins from some bloke who took offence and blocked me (which is apparently a thing). The categories are not backed up by any academic study but are useful in lumping things together that they may be examined. I am aware that the list is by no means complete and would appreciate additional examples of strange armour from around the world. I am also aware that there are many composite forms that combine one or more of the following categories - this is especially the case with Japanese armour which seems to be approximately as complex as all the armour of the rest of the world combined (so I am trying to avoid it). I'll do shields and helmets later on. The categories I have chosen are based on techniques of manufacture and are; Fibre/Wooden Armour: wooden armour. rattan armour, things composed primarily of raw cellulose. Skin Armour: leather, hides, things composed of the skins of other things Textile Armour: armour composed of woven fabrics Scale/Lamellar Armour: armour composed of individual plates attached to itself or to a backing Brigandine/Coat of plates: armour composed of individual plates attached to the inside of a garment Mail Armour: armour composed of a mesh of linked metal rings Plate Armour: armour composed primarily of metal plates The Armours Fibre/Wood - these armours are, along with the Skin category, among the most primitive. I am certain, though, that they provided significant military advantage for those who wore them, especially if they were fighting unarmoured enemies, which, in the contexts these kinds of armours existed, was highly likely. Papuan woven fibre cuirasses Aleutian wooden rod armour - Alaska Gilbert Islands woven coconut fibre armour with porcupine puffer fish helmet Nauru woven coconut fibre armour Shasta wooden rod and fibre armour - Pacific Northwest Tao woven rattan and fish leather cuirass - Taiwan Tlingit wooden splint and woven fibre armour - Alaska. Note awesome wooden helmet and bevor Skin Armour: Not nearly as prominent as you'd think from the depictions in film, television and rpgs, various forms of leather and hide armour have existed in various cultures over the centuries. Most have rotted so we have to make do with such cryptic references as this one describing rhinoceros hide armour in the Chinese Warring States period, 5th to 3rd century BC (at the end of which the species were, unsurprisingly, hunted to local extinction): "The armorers (han jên) make the cuirasses (kia). Those made from the hide of the two-horned rhinoceros (si) consist of seven layers of hide; those made from the hide of the single-horned rhinoceros (se) consist of six layers. Those made from a combination of both hides consist of five layers. The first endure a hundred years; the second, two hundred; the third, three hundred." Note: I'd like to find some authentic, non-fantasy cuir-boulli but Gygax casts too long a shadow Chukchi walrus hide and wood armour from Eastern Siberia, note the special back shield characteristic of Chukchi and Koryak armours The Chukchis were formidable warriors who offered ferocious resistance to Russian colonisation, from a 1909 description of Chukchi warriors: "To be fit for fighting, every warrior undergoes hard training, and spends all his leisure in various exercises ... The hero must run for long distances, drawing a heavily-loaded sledge. He carries stone and timber, jumps up in the air, but above all, he fences with his long spear. He performs this exercise quite alone; and the chief feature of it is the brandishing of the spear with the utmost force, so that it bends like a piece of raw reindeer leg-skin. He also practices shooting with the bow, and uses for this purpose in various arrows [sic], sharp and blunt. from all these exercises he acquires great skill and agility ... When he is shot at, he avoids the arrows by springing to one side, or parries them all with the butt-end of the spear, or simply catches them between his fingers and throws them back." Roman Crocodile skin armour and Helmet from Egypt 3rd century AD Said to be ceremonial But the Osprey Men-at-Arms series of books will interpret everything in the fightingest way possible Jackboots were a legitimate form of armour, Notably, greaves and sabatons were among the first components of plate armour abandoned and replaced with these Leather Cuirass from the Indonesian island of Sulawesi Buff Coat, 17th century Engrish. These were notable for costing more than the cuirass of plate it was customarily worn with (for peculiar historical reasons) Yami fish leather cuirass and rattan helmet, Taiwan. Yes, fish leather is apparently a thing. Textile Armour: this represents the most widespread and unsung type of armour in history. It worked quite well in surprising contexts. I have seen recreations of linen jacks resisting reconstructions of bodkin arrows fired from replica longbows admirably. Aztec manuscript depicting ichcahuipilli padded armour. Probably similar to European gambesons. Notable for the fact that many Spanish eventually adopted its use because it was less oppressively hot than plate cuirasses Quilted armour from the Cameroon Indian Chilta hazar masha, coat of a thousand nails, constructed of many layers of fabric and brass rivets with some plate components Another Chilta hazar masha Eyelet Doublet, holledoublet, a curious construction of tightly sewn eyelets, by all accounts extremely resistant to cutting and piercing Authentic hunting dog jackets constructed with the same technique Details of the construction. It is apparently incredibly time-consuming French 14th century Jupon, padded armour of quilted construction, essentially the same thing as a gambeson German 15th -16th century wappenrock, probably of layered linen Reconstruction of a linothorax, a rigid form of armour constructed from layers of linen glued together. The resulting object is like ultra-tough papier-mache From Hans Memling's Altarpiece of St. Ursula, note the bloke on the left wearing a jack with jack-chains, metal reinforcement splints on his arms. Also notable is the fact he is wearing the garment over a mail shirt, perfectly standard practice This is a strange one, not only is Japanese armour complicated and strange in every other way, they also invented the horo, which is a fabric covered wicker frame that offers protection from blows from behind. These things can be huge and imposing and definitely constitute part of the samurai's considerable arsenal of psychological warfare Korean fabric armour looks like a potato sack Sudanese jibba, padded armour of quilted construction More Sudanese armour. I get the distinct impression that there were parts of Africa experiencing mediaeval combat well into the modern era This image depicts a type of Russian padded armour called a tyegilyai which is difficult to track down in its original form when you got no Cyrillic to work with Scale/Lamellar Armour: closely-related forms of armour based on little plates laced together. The distinction is that lamellar plates are laced together independent of a backing and scale plates are laced directly to a backing. Brigandine and coats of plates are closely related forms that have the plates on the inside. Unfortunately nomenclature does not provide a convenient term allowing me to lump them together. Chukchi lamellar made of bone, walrus hide and deer antler apparently, the helmet is also lamellar European "penny plate" helmet of scale construction Japanese coin armour, close resemblance to Meyrick's apocryphal "ringmail" Japanese lacquered leather scale armour Koryak iron lamellar, 1901. The Koryaks lived in Eastern Siberia near the Chukchis and with them made a transition from bone lamellar to iron Sudanese ring armour from Battle of Omdurman, 1898, Meyrick style but half a world away and centuries too late Yolo leather lamellar, Chinese, Note lacquered leather arm defence Leather scale armour. I can't find a reference but I recall seeing this listed as Scythian, so maybe 3rd century BC Polynesian coconut husk scale armour on backing of woven rattan Roman lorica squamata iron scale armour. Italian iron scale armour, 14th century Tlingit Chinese coin armour, apparently the Tlingit traded furs and were paid in Chinese coins which they evidently had difficulty spending. I can imagine it would be useful to have it on you if you need to purchase something. Reconstruction of Valsgarde pre-Viking splinted arm and leg defense WWI French steel body armour of a structure similar to Meyrick's apocryphal tegulated mail construction Reconstruction of Qin dynasty ceremonial stone lamellar, 3rd century BC Tibetan iron lamellar with lamellar aventail on helmet, possibly 16th -17th century Filipino Moro carabao (water buffalo) horn cuirass and helmet emulating Spanish plate armour Brigandine/Coat-of-Plates: this form of armour is like inside-out lamellar or scale armour, even to the extent that there are examples of coats of plates that are constructed of old lames from recycled lamellar. The distinction tends to be that brigandines are composed of smaller plates, are often stylishly emulative of civilian jerkins and are a later development. Coats of plates are technological precursors to European plate armour of the later Mediaeval and have a comparitively clunky quality. Italian 16th century brigandine showing construction. Mongolian boots with metal plates inside Boru coat of plates, iron and leather, African Swedish Coat of Plates from the Battle of Visby in 1361 Swedish Coat of Plates from the Battle of Visby in 1361, showing the variation in the size and shape and number of plates Reconstruction of a Visby Coat of Plates Another 16th century Italian Brigandine English jack of plates, distinct from the brigandine in that the plates are sewn in rather than riveted Mail Armour: flexible mesh woven of metal rings. All mail known in Europe since its invention by the Celts in the 3rd century BC is made with riveted rings or a combination of riveted and solid rings, though much Asian mail is made of rings that are not riveted but butted together, which makes them significantly weaker. Proper riveted mail is notable for being pretty much invulnerable to cutting blows. You can get bludgeoned to death through it and a good thrust with a strong weapon can break a few rings and wound but cutting it is hard. It's also pretty good against arrows provided some kind of padding is worn underneath. Venetian 15th century riveted mail hauberk Sind Mail and Plate armour, 18th to 19th century, India or Pakistan Arming doublet with mail sleeves and voiders, 15th century European "Bishop's Mantle" constructed of over 100,000 individual riveted links, German, 16th century French Arming doublet with mail sleeves Japanese mail and plate armour, Japan has a bewildering number of mail weaves. Japanese mail is always sewn to a fabric backing Japanese Yoroi Katabira with mail sewn inside a padded garment Ottoman kazaghand with mail sewn inside 15th century. This armour was also referred to as a jazerant or gestron Moro mail and plate armour with mail and plate helmet/coif Persian mail and plate armour and barding, 1450 Russian baidana mail, notable for its use of flat "washer" shaped riveted rings Russian baidana mail shirt belonging to Tsar Boris Godunov Plate: As a construction technique for armour, the use of plates of metal is ancient, and approaches high levels of sophistication in Roman times before achieving its apotheosis in the European Renaissance. Plate armour is incredibly difficult to cut or puncture and, contrary to popular belief, very resistant to arrows. There was also a period after the advent of firearms when heavier plate was made bulletproof and shot after construction to provide a dent as proof of that fact. Most, but not all, helmets use this manner of construction. Mycenaean Dendra Panoply, bronze, 15th century BC Bronze cuirass, Netherlands 11th to 8th century BC Etruscan bronze breastplate, 8th century BC Etruscan kardiophylax, bronze pectoral, 7th century BC Greek bell cuirass, bronze, 7th century BC Greek muscle cuirass 475 BC Etruscan triple-disc breastplate, 5th-4th century BC Carthaginian brass breastplate, 3rd century BC Italian transitional armour, 14th century, incorporating elements of brigandine, mail and plate Henry VIII's armour from about 1510, body armour does not improve after this point, Henry outgrows this armour fairly quickly German anime cuirass from about 1590 French Cuirassiers three-quarter armour, 1630, the armour of the lower legs is discarded first Persian krug mail and plate cuirass, 16th to 17th century Japanese breastplate with marks of bullets, 1750 Iron plate cuirass from Nias, Indonesia late 19th to early 20th century

In terms of use of either you may wanna check out Military and Classical Sabre for there are various posts on broadsword use as well.* Or Smallsword Symposium for obvious reasons. Or a number of...

I had the privilege this weekend of travelling to New York City to see the Last Knight exhibit at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (where I had the pleasure of meeting Dr. Tobias Capwell.) The exhibit…

A beautiful pair of blued Wheelock Pistols set with ivory and mother-of-pearl, Germany, ca. end of the 16th century, housed at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Comprising a helmet of armet type, a gorget, breastplate with permanently attached tassets, backplate, pair of pauldrons and vambraces, the vambraces with a set of articulating lames protecting the inside of the elbow joint, right gauntlet, pair of articulated cuisses,

Articulated artificial left hand and forearm, iron, (previously thought to be owned by Gotz von Berlichingen), possibly German, 1560-1600