Today's article will be about a wealth of information that I believe demonstrates that the Christian worldview is true by showing that the earth is quite young, that Noah's Ark could house all those animals, that Chinese Characters hint at the bible, and more. Note: the Pt # are in regard to the video part that I got the information from. Pt-2 The first thing that I want to mention in regards to rock layers is that water is capable of laying down several layers of sediment during a flood, this can be done by one wave too. One example is the Tsunami in Indonesia. Pt-3 Next when we take a look at a fossil of an Archeopteryx we can see that it is super thin, and that it still had flesh when it was flattened. So how is this relevant to the creation/evolution debate you ask? You see, in order to get it that thin, we'd have to chuck a mountain on it before the dirt transforms into rock and also before the animal decays. This would also had to have been done before the bird turned to rock as well. PT-4 Moving on I want to bring up the giant ripples of waves as seen in a Pic located at the Bruce Peninsula in Ontario Canada. These ripples are 300ft from crest to crest, and some elsewhere are a mile long. Take a look at the Montana bear tooth mountains and you can tell that they are flat across the top, this is further evidence of a worldwide flood! Why's that? These mountains are solid granite and 8,000 ft above sea level, and yet people agree that the top of them was carved by water. In regards to geology we can observe in our own lifetimes the land and measure it as it buckles, tilts, and folds (San Andrea's fault). Evolutionary scientist can see the faulting and fracturing of the land, and yet they want to extrapolate that over millions or billions of of years? Therein lies a problem. If you ever go and visit the Grand canyon you can see all around for 10 miles or more. Now let's just assume that the land just tilted slightly over the coarse of millions of years. We'd be able to see a difference in the level of thickness, but in this reality we don't. All of the Grand Canyon's layers are perfectly parallel to each other. Supposing that we tilt the layer just one degree and it would be 921 feet thicker at the other end. Now let's take a look at another evidence of a world wide flood, this time located in Cypress hills Canada. There we find rounded rocks with percussion marks in them. You see, in order to create these marks in the rock. It would have to have been picked up and carried by the water. Let's just forget about the big ones, for Just the average-sized rocks the water would have to be going approx 70 mph and be 100 feet deep in order to make those kind of marks. The ones in Alberta came from Idaho which is 600 miles away. PT- 5 Sometimes an evolutionist may claim that the earth can't be only six thousand years old because we have tree rings showing that the tree is older than that. My response to that would be to tell them to take a look at the sample of tree rings from Axel Heiberg wood. What it takes a tree five years to grow in a temperate climate in today's age, the Axel tree grew in one season when located at Canada's high Arctic. It's like these trees did not experience the winter season in a place which at the present is winter for over half the year. Even during the summer months the sun is very low on the horizon, but these trees had no lack of water, heat, light, or nutrients. This is just one more proof against uniformitarianism because it shows that the present cannot be the key to the past. Besides what is an armadillo doing in the Arctic? In regards to the Grand Canyon Evolutionist will claim that the tiny river carved out the canyon over millions of years. The problem with this is water doesn't run up hill. A more likely scenario would be during the Global Flood we have the water hitting a soft spot in the mountain and then assuage to form the river. In other words the canyon made the river, not the other way around. While we are on the topic of the Grand canyon we see that there are hundreds of Millions of years of missing geologic time in several rock layers! This means that there is no evidence that they ever existed! PT-6 Okay, let's just assume for a second that the geologic column really is 550 million years of accumulated time. Let's also assume that one millimeter of dusts Accumulates each year. This would mean we would have a rock layer 342 miles thick. What we actually have (among the thickest layers) is the Redwall limestone. It's only about 500 ft thick, therefore The Geologic Column only exist in Textbooks. Like the Archeopteryx fossil we have flesh still on a fish when it was crushed into an extremely thin fossil by a whole bunch of sediment, it didn't take millions of years! There have also been accounts of Human footprints found inside Dino footprints, and a human footprint was also found inside Permian rock. PT-8 One reason why you shouldn't place your faith in radiometric dating is because when they dated the grand canon some top layers were said to be older than the bottom ones! That just doesn't make sense. The theory of rock layers being millions of years old must be called into question when you find a small figurine in sediments of layers dated to be 1.8 to 5 Million years old. If you ever go and visit the London National History museum and were able to go into the basement you would find 2 Modern female skeletons (human) that were excavated from Miocene limestone which is dated by evolutionist to be "28 Million years old". When a Pot is found inside a block of coal that is dated to be 285 Million years old, one just has to question the veracity of that claim. Another piece of evidence that debunks evolution is the fossil human finger that was found in the same layer as dinosaurs. PT-9 In regards to the scientific field of paleontology a man by the name of Dale Fuller found the remains of ten modern human skeletons, of both men and women as well as children. What's incredible about this discovery is that he found them in Dakota Sandstone dated to be 100 million years old. If you get the chance take a look at the picture of the Zuiyou Maru Cryptid. Golly, it sure looks like a dead Plesiosaur to me. It was caught by a Japanese fishing trawler, and we know that this carcass isn't a basking shark because it's flippers are narrow at the body. It also has fat and red flesh, doesn't have a dorsal fin, doesn't float, and all it's flippers are about the same size. Pt-10-11 Evolutionist believe dinosaurs never lived alongside man but there have been reports of Pterasaurs still alive in Mexico. Ian Juby paid a local Indian there to see if anyone had seen them. The Indian wondered why because he used to kill them when he was younger cause they were a pest! Evolution is described as change over time, but stasis in the fossil record refutes Darwinian evolution. Don't let evolutionist fool you fossils don't take long to form, it took only 3 months in order to pre-mineralize a fossil teddy bear. PT-13 Macro evolution (the belief that one animal changes into another over time) is a myth! We know this because the hearts of a frog, fish, human, and crocodile are shown to be very different! If you had a hole in your Aorta you would die quick! Yet for Macro evolution to be true we need to add not only holes, but plumbing that goes to organs that don't even exist yet! You would need holes in the heart and arteries, new Arteries going to organs that don't exist, and of course this would need to be done without killing the creature. So we see that it is not possible for evolution to occur using small gradual steps from anything that even remotely resembles a fish into anything remotely resembling a human because it would kill it. PT- 14 It has been suggested that the firmament spoken of in Genesis 1:6-9 was Metallic Hydrogen. That it's properties included a Crystalline structure, that it was opaque or clear, it would have been extremely conductive and Ferromagnetic as well as Fiber optic. It supposedly Glowed Pink too. It also has been theorized that this firmament was composed of water that was in a metallic state and probably located at ten miles Altitude. It wouldn've been suspended by the Meisner effect. Because it was Fiber optic this means that we'd have light on the earth 24/7, 365 days a year. Including the north and south poles. There also would be x2 the atmospheric pressure, and it would filter out ultra violet light, which translates into no c-14 before the flood; an effect which would render c-14 dating as inaccurate. This also means if we have a sample with no c-14 it could've just lived before the flood. In a relevant story Dr. Kei Mori in Tokyo, Japan who simulated some of these conditions that I just mentioned grew his cherry tomato plant 45 feet tall and it lived at least 16 years and it had around 15,000 tomato's on it. This is further evidence to support the account of Genesis that tells us that there was giants on earth in those days and that man lived hundreds of years. Pt- 16 -17 Now is the time in the article where we talk about missing links. There was this guy named Owen love Joy who made a cast of each piece of the Lucy Fossil and then he re sculpted them in order for it to fit his evolutionary assumptions. From the neck up it was clearly a chimp, but from the waist down it appeared human. The thing is there wasn't a whole lot of this skeleton found. Second Lucy's hip was found smashed in forty pieces. The missing link known as Box grove man is based on 2 teeth and part of a leg bone found in Box grove England, but the jaw they used from Germany and the skull from Ethiopia. In this part we are going to look at a few Chinese characters that shows they got their language from the bible. Great+Division+West+Walk=Migrate, Nobleman+Garden=First man, Alive+Dust+Man=First, God+One+Man+Garden=Happiness, 2 trees+Command=Forbidden, 2 Trees+Woman=Covet or desire, Man+Fruit=Naked, Vessel+8+mouths=Boat Another tidbit of information that you may note be aware of is there is at least a 3000 year old poem by the Miao peoples that is recited at wedding/Funerals that is remarkably similar to the book of Genesis. Pt-20-21 Have you ever heard of diatoms? And how do they present a problem for evolutionary theory? Well, diatoms are skeletons of microscopic aquatic organisms and we find them by the trillions buried in lava flows that are supposed to have formed above water over millions of years. Those that scoff at the idea of Noah's ark had better learn the facts first. It had the same capacity as 569 railroad stock cars that could have held 240 sheep each. This equates to it being able to hold 28,450 animals with food and water for a year. Add this to the fact that they wouldn't have to have carried bugs or fish and that they didn't need every species of animal but just different kinds and Noah's ark is completely realistic. Secular Evolutionary Scientist will date the Grand canyon's layers from anywhere between 10,000 to 2.6 billion years old (Uinkaret lava flows), but we can see from the Indian artifacts that are found in the lava flows, that the layers are only 800 to 1,000 years old. So whenever we can test Radiometric Dating it Fails. If evolution was true would we expect Dr. Ron Charles to find snail and coral fossils on Mt. Ararat? It's elevation is 13,600 feet. The final thing that I want to mention today is a Human skull called 1470. It was found in the KBS tuff and was dated by four different methods and five times which all confirmed the exact same age of 2.61 million year approx. The problem was that the skull was supposedly too "modern" for their theory of evolution. So they had two choices, either disregard the skull or forget the theories of ancient man. Guess which one they did. The "scientists" re-dated the skull as well as the layers that they found it in. Therefore the "Absolute" dates that Fitch and Miller originally came up with, the same dates everyone and the dating methods agreed on were tossed out. Someone else tested it and arrived at the conclusion that the skull was 1.6 or 1.8 million years old in order to match their evolutionary theory, and claimed that the Fitch and miller samples were contaminated. The conclusion of this matter is that Radio metric dates are based on evolutionary theory and if they disagree the former is sacrificed. This is what we call circular reasoning. Reference: Youtube series Ian Juby Complete Creation 2nd Edition